This essay is an interpretation of aspects of the Neolithic of Atlantic Europe (c5000-c2000 BC) through the lens of James Joyce’s novel, Finnegans Wake, and an interpretation of his novel, dialectically, through this archaeological optic, complying with Theodor W. Adorno’s injunction to ‘treat profane texts like holy scripture’. This is the occasion to reflect on the coded ‘theological moment’ in the thought of Adorno and Walter Benjamin to activate shifting constellations of Archaeology, Literature and Philosophical critique. At best, the paper constitutes ‘a onestone parable, a rude breathing on the void of to be’ (FW 100.26-27) and, for better or worse, is one of ‘the “rejected stones” of the seemingly non-existent “impossible”‘ (Bielik-Robson 2020b: 65).
So goes the introduction to the uploaded text on the academia dot edu site… I’m uploading a pdf of it here (with some minor amendments and corrections) in the interest of open access.
‘Skatterlings’, the text, is based on a presentation to The Marrano Phenomenon Conference, organised by Agata Bielik-Robson, which took place in Warsaw, in September 2019. I’d been asked to participate in this conference by Agata on the strength of staging an encounter between the cryptotheological approach developed by her and the strange conjunction between James Joyce’s writings and an archaeoastronomical phenomenon associated with Portuguese Neolithic tombs. That text, A Ruby and Triangled Sign upon the Forehead of Taurus: Modalities of Revelation in Megalithic Archaeoastronomy and James Joyce’s Novels Ulysses and Finnegans Wake, was published here. I remain grateful to Agata for giving me the opportunity to publish and present material which would otherwise have languished in obscurity and helping to open the door to an interstitial territory I continue to navigate.
‘Skatterlings’ was initially written as a contribution to an edited conference volume. Once it became evident that it was not to be included in that volume (when I found it was published in 2022 as The Marrano Way: Between Betrayal and Innovation) I allowed the draft to drift over the word-count, fractally, and gave up on any further attempts to ‘Derridaize’ the text, as had previously been requested, in line with what I surmise would have been the ‘house style’. I hastily uploaded that document onto academia dot edu.
Here it is, duly corrected and amended.