Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
Blake as Shaman: The Neuroscience of Hallucinations and Milton’s Lark, by David Worrall
April 7, 2024‘Skatterlings of a Stone’: Finnegans Wake and the Moment of Philosophical Critique in Megalithic Archaeology
September 10, 2023This essay is an interpretation of aspects of the Neolithic of Atlantic Europe (c5000-c2000 BC) through the lens of James Joyce’s novel, Finnegans Wake, and an interpretation of his novel, dialectically, through this archaeological optic, complying with Theodor W. Adorno’s injunction to ‘treat profane texts like holy scripture’. This is the occasion to reflect on the coded ‘theological moment’ in the thought of Adorno and Walter Benjamin to activate shifting constellations of Archaeology, Literature and Philosophical critique. At best, the paper constitutes ‘a onestone parable, a rude breathing on the void of to be’ (FW 100.26-27) and, for better or worse, is one of ‘the “rejected stones” of the seemingly non-existent “impossible”‘ (Bielik-Robson 2020b: 65).
So goes the introduction to the uploaded text on the academia dot edu site… I’m uploading a pdf of it here (with some minor amendments and corrections) in the interest of open access.
‘Skatterlings’, the text, is based on a presentation to The Marrano Phenomenon Conference, organised by Agata Bielik-Robson, which took place in Warsaw, in September 2019. I’d been asked to participate in this conference by Agata on the strength of staging an encounter between the cryptotheological approach developed by her and the strange conjunction between James Joyce’s writings and an archaeoastronomical phenomenon associated with Portuguese Neolithic tombs. That text, A Ruby and Triangled Sign upon the Forehead of Taurus: Modalities of Revelation in Megalithic Archaeoastronomy and James Joyce’s Novels Ulysses and Finnegans Wake, was published here. I remain grateful to Agata for giving me the opportunity to publish and present material which would otherwise have languished in obscurity and helping to open the door to an interstitial territory I continue to navigate.
‘Skatterlings’ was initially written as a contribution to an edited conference volume. Once it became evident that it was not to be included in that volume (when I found it was published in 2022 as The Marrano Way: Between Betrayal and Innovation) I allowed the draft to drift over the word-count, fractally, and gave up on any further attempts to ‘Derridaize’ the text, as had previously been requested, in line with what I surmise would have been the ‘house style’. I hastily uploaded that document onto academia dot edu.
Here it is, duly corrected and amended.
Between Fractured Landscape and Neurological Event: A Philosophical Configuration of Anomalous Experience
September 3, 2023I make no bones of the fact that the following essay was rejected out of hand by a psychical research journal of record for being ‘philosophical heavy’ (sic) after what must have been a thorough reflection of 36 hours or less over a weekend. Familiarising myself since with the conventions of that publication it’s obvious why such an – admittedly convoluted – exercise in philosophical critique would be out of synch with the static cognitive ideals which govern such research. There was really nowhere else I could have gone with this material and in response to the rejection I uploaded a pdf of the essay to academia dot edu. I’ve come to realise that that platform still presents insurmountable barriers to many, requiring an account to be opened, so I’m belatedly uploading the pdf here so it’s more accessible. As with anything Microsoft Edge-related, caution should be exercised – don’t (as I nearly did) accidentally set it as your default browser!
Here’s the abstract:
This essay investigates the anomalous character of two neurological episodes undergone by the author. Their perceived correspondence with periods of directed focus on archaeological and topographical themes has connotations beyond their ostensible neurobiological origins. These heterogeneous elements comprise a dynamic experiential complex, implicated in the induction of meaningful coincidence. The nonidentity of this indissoluble, contradictory ‘something’ with the static cognitive ideal of the concept elicits an approach informed by principles of philosophical presentation elaborated, respectively, by Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) and Theodor W. Adorno (1903-1969). I draw on their theologically inflected attempt to retrieve the truth content in the object, which eludes identification and classification in customary philosophical and scientific determinations of the object of knowledge. That the proper approach to the unknown object is, rather, a self-forgetful immersion in it, and possession by it, implies a mimetic style of interpretation that takes shape immanently to the strange encounter with phenomena. Attempting to glimpse, in their subsequent development, essential qualities in the sphere where neurology and topography coincide, I stage a retrospective choreography of individually opaque elements, to spark ‘auratic’ moments of sudden reciprocal insight, illuminating the transitory promise of fulfilment which is repeatedly broken to preserve its truth. For Adorno, the immediate, definitive resolution of tensions riddling this constellation is impossible in the non-redeemed world. Hence, descending into the abyss of significances, I trace intimations of a latent transcendence, which has found refuge in art and registers in anomalous experience, its evanescent glow imbuing the ‘esoteric’ form of this essay.
To break the attunements of being
August 12, 2023I can’t help but see an affinity between the ‘logic of disintegration’ of Theodor W. Adorno’s philosophy – a logic which he recognised in the atonality of his teacher, Alban Berg’s music, with its tendency towards particularisation and disintegration – and the ‘intermittent rhythm’ of the music of Don Van Vliet/Captain Beefheart, its dissonance contrived to disrupt the hypnotic banality of what Beefheart called ‘that momma heartbeat, that bom, bom, bom’, so similar to the phenomenological ‘attunements of being’ that Adorno sought to shatter. The sky speckled with stars, the sombre ground interspersed with particles of light, is an obvious analogical field for attempting to ‘unlock the constellation’, a form of speculative thinking which Adorno derived from Walter Benjamin’s famous proposition in his Trauerspiel (1928), that ideas are to objects as constellations are to stars. One can therefore form a constellation between Adorno’s micrological thinking, focused on fragmentary particulars – figuratively-speaking, from the perspective of the Lurianic kabbalah, sparks of the scattered cosmic body of Adam Kadmon: ‘Damadam to infinities!’ (Finnegans Wake page 18, line 30) – and Beefheart’s application of a convulsive logic that stutters ‘in speckled, speckled speculation’ (Van Vliet 1969) enacted in his Trauermarsch (funeral march) for bourgeois musical sensibilities, Trout Mask Replica, released on June 16th, 1969, coinciding with Bloomsday, the day James Joyce’s novel, Ulysses. takes place in 1904.
Bees swarm in the church of the Holy Ghost, Crowcombe
July 25, 2023Into the Esplumoir
June 9, 2023‘All souls were believed to be gathered in a big cage or treasure house in heaven, in a columbarium’ – The Esplumoir Merlin: A Study in Its Cabalistic Sources, by Helen Adolf. Speculum, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Apr., 1946), pp. 173-193.
Returning the Gaze
April 30, 2022Construing ‘the lazily eye’ (FW 293.11) formed by the ‘ALP diagram’ on page 293 of Finnegans Wake as a thought-image to invert an attribute of Guy Debord’s central conceptual device, the Spectacle, which ‘concentrates all gazing and all consciousness’ (Debord 1983: Para.3):
“In part, a secularisation of ‘the eye of the world, whereby the Absolute sees Its own works’ (Bakhtiar 1976: 11), it is characterised by Debord as the projection of human powers into a transcendent realm, which takes on the form of the Spectacle (Russell 2021: 76), the social organisation of appearances in modern capitalist society. Implicit in such an inversion is the aspiration to reverse the perspective of the very structural totality the Spectacle is intended to define – as one interpretation of Walter Benjamin’s messianism puts it, the ‘radical destruction of the world of images’ consists in their dialectical reversal (Desideri 2016: 186). Although the thought-image at the core of Finnegans Wake is not identical with the ‘Eye of God’ or Debord’s Spectacle, it can still constellate thinking around these and other themes and draw attention to the Old Testament ban on making images of God, ‘the prohibition on the image’ (bilderverbot) as it has been employed by Adorno and Max Horkheimer as the ‘awareness that the world is appearance’ and therefore does not represent the ultimate reality (Jopp and Martins 2018: 679). This hidden element of the critique of Benjamin and Adorno, what Horkheimer called a ‘Judaism undercover’ (Bielik-Robson 2019a: xi), gives their ideas a critical and methodological force indispensable for disintegrating the pantheistic unity of a more-than-allegorical spectacular totality, derived from a kabbalistic cosmic drama with its own implicit critique of pleromatic orderings of society, of which Debord’s Spectacle describes but one.”
More here – Skatterlings of a Stone: Finnegans Wake and the Moment of Philosophical Critique in Megalithic Archaeology
Stonehenge and the Stalinist Amalgam Technique
November 20, 2020Interesting to see archaeologists who support the Highways England scheme to blast a tunnel and a dual carriageway through a bit of Wiltshire south of Stonehenge resorting to an atrociously dishonest polemical technique known as the ‘amalgam technique’. It is a way of invalidating any and all opposition to a policy by tainting all opponents with the bad opinions of a few. As a technique, it’s a bit of a double-edged sword, because by the same logic these archaeologists can be held responsible for all the continuing crimes of Empire (from Amritsar to Windrush to Grenfell) enacted by the British state with which they stand in solidarity. If anything, knowing collusion with an infrastructure project of the imperial state – “BUILD THE TUNNEL! BUILD THE TUNNEL!” – is worse. Consider that the industrial revolution in the UK, of which the tunnel project is a formal continuation, was initially funded by compensation paid to slave owners, who invested their ill-gotten gains in infrastructure projects like new roads, railways and canals. Arguably, every enterprise carried on in the wake of this development is a legacy of it and homage to it.
A rather quiet protagonist in this affair is the Ministry of Defence (the current euphemism for what was The War Office), which is allowing heritage bodies like the National Trust and English Heritage to be ‘cultural shields’, to take the flak for heritage destruction which bears its imprint as surely as barrows on Salisbury Plain with tank tracks and shell craters – a construction project in line with its logistical aims – viz Johnson’s multi-billion pound ‘Let them eat lead’ announcement, accompanied with photo-opportunities on Salisbury Plain. I find the effective collaboration of pro-tunnel archaeologists with the logistical needs of the war machine deeply distasteful. They really have some brass neck berating opponents for bad opinions while feigning ignorance of their own role in a military-archaeological-industrial complex, structurally far worse than having bad opinions, however despicable.
Perhaps, ultimately, the pro-tunnel archaeologists anticipate a share in the spoils of such a conquest as its building would signify. More work for archaeology units, additions to the store of knowledge about the past, in an extraction of ‘cultural resources’ not totally dissimilar to the extraction practices of the fossil fuel industry. The generation of ‘heritage capital’ is, however, a mere by-product of a system – with its arterial roads and high-speed rail – leading inexorably to climate catastrophe and mass extinction.
I’m sure pro-tunnel archaeologists’ current recourse to a notoriously dishonest technique of labelling opponents isn’t reflected in the quality of the work they did to gain their qualifications, so why not be consistent with their earlier work, lest it be judged by association too?
‘Primitivism’ in Art, the conceptual space of simultaneity, and other derivations of the concept of ‘the Spectacle’
November 1, 2020Your piece can play a decisive role in the prehistory of the anti-spectacle.
Guy Debord, letter to André Frankin, 24 July 1960
Apropos of the origins of Situationist usage of the term, ‘spectacle’ mentioned in this piece – https://cominsitu.wordpress.com/2020/10/30/from-the-commodity-to-the-spectacle-debords-marx-russell-2019/ – I feel compelled to present here part of a discussion of simultaneity and spectacle in art, extracted from an unpublished PhD, The World’s End: Rock Images, Altered Realities, and the Limits of Social Theory (Crook 2004), articulated in the context of the interpretation of prehistoric rock art in north-west Europe, sub-headed, The Optics of Simultaneity. Negotiating the conceptual space of this ‘north-west passage of the geography of real life’ (Debord), it becomes evident that the concept of ‘the Spectacle’ evolved in part out of the validation of the ‘simultaneous perspective’ of so-called ‘primitive artists’ as part of the critique of the alienating ‘masterpiece’ of urbanism constructed in the perspective of the Renaissance rationalists, and was a collective effort in which Asger Jorn played a critical role, as well as Attila Kotanyi and Raoul Vaneigem. The concluding passages of this section explain the importance of Finnegans Wake in constructing a conceptual space for the interpretation of ‘Atlantic Rock Art’, via Asger Jorn on simultaneity.
Note: I’ll add the bibliographic references fairly soon…
THE OPTICS OF SIMULTANEITY
The infinite changing of things in time is, states Boethius, an attempt to imitate the state of the presence of unchanging life, but continuously falling from sameness into change, from the immediacy of presence into the infinite extent of past and future, because it is unable to portray or equal that state. It ‘cannot possess simultaneously the whole fullness of its life’ (Boethius 1999:133). In this thesis I emulate ‘a property of the mind of God’ by the attempt to embrace ‘the whole of everlasting life in one simultaneous present’ (Boethius 1999:133). This is the essence of what I elaborate as an ordering principle for this study: simultaneity, a quality of knowing transcending all temporal change, embracing all the infinite recesses of past and future, and viewing them in the immediacy of its knowing as though they are happening in the present. The modality of vision, understood as a never-ending, two-way process of engagement between the perceiver and the perceived (Ingold 2000:257), proves central to the development of this concept. We must first distinguish the image of the spectator – detached from the world – from the image of the seer, ‘Immersed in the visible by his body the seer does not appropriate what he sees…he opens himself to the world’ (Merleau-Ponty 1964a:162, in Ingold 2000:264). Suggestive of a visionary, supernatural quality, this is consonant with exactly the vision of a cosmic totality displayed in this thesis:
As I contemplate the blue of the sky I am not set over against it as an acosmic subject; I do not possess it in thought…I am the sky itself as it is drawn together and unified, and as it begins to exist for itself; my consciousness is saturated with this limitless blue
(Merleau-Ponty 1962:214, in Ingold 2000:264).
Recognisible is Ibn Arabi’s description of the ‘Universal Prototype’, embodied in the Prophet, who ‘stands in the same relation to God as the pupil which is the instrument of vision to the eye’. Through the Universal Prototype, ‘God becomes conscious of Self in all the Divine aspects’, it is ‘the eye of the world, whereby the Absolute sees Its own works’ (Bakhtiar 1976:11). In seeing its own works through vision ‘we come into contact with the sun and the stars…we are everywhere at once’ (Merleau-Ponty 1964a:187, in Ingold 2000:264). Ingold plays on the trope of a fall into alienation from a prelapsarian state of grace as he observes that the joy and astonishment of the discovery that ‘I can see’ gives way to the mundane indifference of ‘I see things’ (Ingold 2000: 265). The need to reverse this perspective, to recover the sense of vision original to our experience of the world, and that is a precondition for its objectification is what motivates the work of the painter (ibid.).
The ‘reversal of perspective’ of the ‘society of the spectacle’ was an artistic and political goal of participants in the Situationist International (1957-1972), who sought to determine how ‘the appearance of a cosmic consciousness in the classless society; the abolition of all functional signs in human relations; and the birth of new sentiments and of other unpredictable upheavals’ would ‘accelerate the processes that lead to the stage of this dialectical civilisation of leisure and of work for all humanity together’ (Frankin 1960, emphasis in original). For the situationists modern capitalism ‘organises the reduction of all social life to a spectacle’, is incapable of presenting any spectacle ‘other than that of our own alienation’, in which its urbanistic dream is its ‘masterpiece’ (Kotanyi and Vaneigem 1961, in Knabb 1981: 65). The painterly dimensions of involvement in and detachment from the world are expressed in spatial terms, in that:
We think we are living in the world, when in fact we are being positioned in a perspective. No longer the simultaneous perspective of primitive painters, but the perspective of the Renaissance rationalists. It is hardly possible for looks, thoughts and gestures to escape the attraction of the distant vanishing point which orders and deforms them, situating them in its spectacle
(Vaneigem 1983: 68).
The temporal distance afforded by this spectacle translates into a problem in the separation in time between the prehistorian and prehistoric people in that
we enjoy the perspective of seeing their lives encapsulated in a past that is somehow finished. This disengages people in prehistory from participation in changing presents, their own pasts and also futures.
(Goodman 1999:147).
In this way the temporal separation of observer and object aligns with the ‘objective time’ of chronology in which a static view of the past fixes the actions of people in prehistory in ‘a sequence of events which ignores that they came about amidst any number of other possible outcomes’ (ibid). Consequently, past action is seen to give rise necessarily to the outcomes identified by the prehistorian, in effect removing ‘prehistoric people from a role in decision-making’ (ibid). To recover the possibility of past generations to continue to ‘interrogate, disturb and challenge our time and our custody for their times’ (Chambers 1998:194) means adopting an ethical and involved, rather than a positivist and distanced, paradigm of knowledge (Moses 1992:127, in Chambers 1998:184). Scope for such an involvement is what the conceptual space of simultaneity suggests. A pictorial dimension for simultaneity was found in decorative principles by situationists such as the Danish artist, Asger Jorn:
Persian ornament does not yield its beauty, that is the possibility of grasping it as a whole, if you do not give up looking in a logical sequence … but instead see the relation the parts all have to one another at once and simultaneously. Our viewing must be expanded to take in the whole; stretched, not limited to one point in the whole
(Jorn quoted in Birtwistle 1986:53).
The symbolism of geometric patterns, such as those of ‘Persian ornament’, is generated through the concept of symmetry, in which correspondence in size, shape and relative position of the parts to the whole is their ordering principle, symbolising ‘the cosmic processes characterised by extension in all directions, by boundlessness and by infinite divisibility’ (Bakhtiar 1976: 59). To adopt a property of ‘the mind of God’, as I do in this thesis, then
A field of reality is something one chooses. Simultaneity is something one decides oneself or more correctly, everything exists under particular conditions seen from a particular view point in an absolute simultaneity. Establishing oneself in the absolute optics of simultaneity is called mysticism in the Swedenborgian sense. However … absolute simultaneity cannot be explained as anything other than absolute space.
(Jorn1962:77, in Shield 1998:118, emphasis in original).
Perceiving the world over a sufficient length of time, and along a sufficiently extended set of paths, is tantamount to perceiving it ‘as if one could be everywhere at once’ (Gibson 1979: 197, in Ingold 2000: 227). Just as the multiple paths of geometric patterns draw us within a whole, so our perception of the environment as whole is forged in the passage from place to place, in histories of movement and changing horizons along the way (Ingold 2000: 227). Animals and people see as they move, not just in the intervals between movements, an ‘ambulatory vision’ that takes place along a ‘path of observation’, which is not to be understood as an infinite series of discrete points, occupied at successive instants, but as a continuous itinerary of movement (Ingold 2000:226). Implicit is a challenge to the sequential periodisation of chronology, borne out by the situationist critique of existing spheres and ‘their integration into a single space-time construction (the situation: a dynamic system in an environment and ludic behaviour)’ (Debord 1958, in McDonough 2002: 55). The situation affords the critique of the topological chains of chronology inasfar as
the exclusion of singularities and interruptions, the constancy of intensity and the unique feeling of the propagation of the processes…also excludes the division in several times
(Jorn 1994b:32).
Chronology’s analogue in the linear progression of text draws it on one side of a contradiction between ‘simultaneity’ and ‘linearity’, parallelling the distinction Suzanne Langer (1942) draws between ‘discursive’ and ‘presentational’ forms. Language and thought are discursive processes from which a series of independent component parts derive their overall meaning through sequential articulation (cited in Miller 1987:97). It is tantamount to the ‘falling into step’ of words (Khayati 1966 in Knabb 1981:173), in which information – statistics, news, performance indicators – ‘is the poetry of power’ (anon:1963, in Knabb 1981:115) The rules of grammar are intended to analyse the structure underlying this discursive order (Miller 1987:97). On the other hand, a presentational form such as a picture, has no such divisions. In assimilating a presentational form we have to take it in all at once, rather than sequentially, and there is nothing equivalent to grammatical structure underlying it (Langer 1942:90-93, in Miller 1987:97).
In ‘running about their ways…pleating a pattern Gran Geamatron showed them’ (FW 257.3-5)1 a ‘texture of simultaneity’ is woven within Finnegans Wake, as ‘If there is a future in every past that is present’ (FW 496.35), where ‘a consciousness is free to consider events in any order it wishes, or spatially rather than temporally’ (Purdy 1982:212). Conceived as a unitary movement, the semantics of mystical union present in simultaneity offer a field of ‘acausal sympathy’ in which events, including the carving of motifs on rocks, can be situated. Thus, by ‘the foreknowledge or prevision by which he discovers all things, it will be more correct to think of it…as the knowledge of a never ending presence…better called providence or “looking forth” than prevision or “seeing beforehand”’ (Boethius 1999:134). This chimes in with the report that for Joyce, ‘his books were not to be taken as mere books, but as acts of prophecy’ (Ellmann 1959: 562, in Purdy 1982: 207).
1All quotations from Finnegans Wake are abbreviated to the initials of the book, and the page and line number. Thus, page 257, lines 3-5 are represented as FW 257.3-5.
References
Bakhtiar, L.1976. Sufi: Expressions of the Mystic Quest. London: Thames and Hudson.
Birtwistle, G. 1986. Living Art: Asger Jorn’s comprehensive theory of art between Helhesten and Cobra (1946-1949). Utrecht: Reflex.
Boethius. 1999. The Consolation of Philosophy (translated by V.Watts) London: Penguin.
Chambers, I. 1998. ‘History, the Baroque and the Judgement of the Angels’. In Marcus, L. and Nead, L. (eds), The Actuality of Walter Benjamin London: Lawrence and Wishart. 172-193.
Frankin, A. 1960. Programmatic Sketches. Internationale Situationniste. No 4 (June 1960). Translated by Reuben Keehan at https://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/programmatic.html
Goodman, M. 1999. Temporalities of Prehistoric Life: household development and community continuity. In: Bruck, J and Goodman, M (eds). Making Places in the Prehistoric World. London: UCL Press. 145-159.
Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.
Jorn, A. 1994b ‘Open Creation and its Enemies’. Originally published December 1960 in Internationale Situationniste 5. Trans. from the French by Fabian Tompsett..London: Unpopular Books
Joyce, J. 1939. Finnegans Wake. London: Faber and Faber
Knabb, Ken. 1981. Situationist International Anthology. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets
McDonough, T. (ed) 2002. Guy Debord and the Situationist International. Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press
Miller, D. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Blackwell
Purdy, S. 1982. Let’s Hear What Science Has to Say: Finnegans Wake and the Gnosis of Science. Benstock, B. (ed.) The Seventh of Joyce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Shield, P. 1998. Comparative Vandalism: Asger Jorn and the Artistic Attitude to Life Aldershot and Valby: Ashgate/Borgen
Vaneigem, R. 1983. The Revolution of Everyday Life. London/New York: Rebel Press/ Left Bank Books. (First published as Traité de savoir-vivre a l’usage des jeunes générations. Paris: Gallimard, 1967. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith.)